Change in product management rarely fails because the engineering team can’t ship. It fails because executives feel threatened, metrics are misaligned, or the proposed change looks like an organisational attack rather than a commercial opportunity. That’s why the recent Cutlefish piece, The Genius of SVPG, struck a chord: it explains how the Silicon Valley Product Group have learned to frame transformation so leaders don’t reach for the veto button. If you’re a CPO, CEO or head of innovation wrestling with internal change, it’s essential reading.
Why SVPG’s framing works with executives
There are three simple, powerful moves in SVPG’s approach that make executives listen rather than resist.
- Start from outcomes, not org charts. Talk about revenue, retention, cost-to-serve and time-to-value instead of rewriting reporting lines. That translates product practice into the language boards already use.
- Reduce perceived risk by staging change. Begin with bounded pilots that demonstrate measurable value rather than a wholesale reorg. Executives will fund an experiment; they will rarely fund an uncertain overhaul.
- Swap blame for partnership. Frame transformation as enabling leaders to achieve their existing priorities faster, rather than asking them to abandon control.
Three tactical moves to make the board say yes
Turning the above into action requires discipline. Here are three practical tactics I use when I’m trying to get executive buy‑in.
1. Translate product metrics into financial levers
Boards care about P&L and capital allocation. Recast product outcomes as direct financial levers: improved activation increases lifetime value; faster iteration reduces cost-of-failure; better discovery shortens sales cycles. Use conservative, testable assumptions and show a 6–12 month payback for the pilot. This isn’t vanity—it’s how you make product ROI visible at the executive table.
2. Propose a ‘safe-to-fail’ rollout
Design a pilot that is time-boxed, funded, measurable and reversible. Commit to clear success criteria and a governance cadence (monthly steering, fortnightly demos). By limiting exposure you convert an abstract threat into a manageable experiment: the board is far more likely to support something that can be stopped without collateral damage.
3. Create a leadership-facing narrative
Craft a one-page brief for the CEO and the board: the problem, the hypothesis, the pilot plan, the expected financial impact, and the ask. Keep it short and focused on risks and mitigations. Executives are busy; they’ll respond to crisp, commercially grounded narratives—exactly what SVPG emphasises in Transformed.
Organisational design: autonomy with alignment
One of the hardest parts of any transition is balancing autonomous, empowered product teams with corporate governance. The solution isn’t to abdicate control; it’s to redesign governance so it protects outcomes, not processes. Three principles help:
- Measure outcomes, not activity. Replace feature checklists with leading and lagging metrics that map to business goals.
- Limit the sphere of control. Give teams decision-making power within clearly defined boundaries.
- Design a light governance loop. Regular review meetings that focus on learning and trade-offs rather than approvals.
These ideas mirror what organisations such as Spotify and large banks like ING experimented with: small, cross-functional teams with clear objectives, backed by lightweight portfolio oversight.
A short case: how leadership framing made the difference
Consider Microsoft’s move under its recent leadership shift. By rearticulating the company’s mission and tying engineering teams to clear commercial outcomes, they moved from siloed projects to product-led services. The leadership narrative—focused on cloud growth and developer engagement—gave teams permission to prioritise long-term platform value over short-term feature wins. The lesson is simple: change the narrative, change the incentives.
Practical checklist before you walk into the boardroom
- Prepare a one-page, financial-first brief with conservative estimates.
- Design a bounded pilot with measurable success criteria and a stop/go review.
- Name the executive sponsor and the decision points up front.
- Map how the pilot reduces a direct cost or grows a revenue stream.
- Bring examples—preferably from comparable markets—to show feasibility.
Credit where it’s due: the ideas above take direct inspiration from the Cutlefish piece The Genius of SVPG and the SVPG playbook in Transformed. Read them first; then come back and tailor the approach to your organisation.
What I’d try this week
If you want momentum, pick one product area where a small team can improve a clear commercial metric. Build the one-page brief, line up an executive sponsor who will publicly own the experiment, and commit to a three-month pilot. Use the pilot to show how autonomy + accountability beats large, slow committees every time.
Product transformation isn’t about replacing leaders—it’s about helping them deliver their priorities faster and with less risk. If you can reframe the work that way, you’ll find most boards are not the obstacle—they are the accelerator.
Further reading: the original Cutlefish essay is an excellent short primer; the SVPG book Transformed lays out the mechanics.
Leave a Reply