What happens when an organisation treats teams as boxes on an organogram rather than as the engine of value creation? Too often the answer is predictably dull: lots of meetings, fragmented accountability and a parade of features that nobody remembers. The alternative is to design teams as units of outcome — small, empowered, multidisciplinary groups that own problems, not tasks.
Why small, empowered teams win
There’s a simple nervous-system logic to small teams: fewer handoffs, faster decisions and clearer ownership. The two‑pizza rule — popularised by Amazon to enforce small team size — is shorthand for a deeper design choice: constrain team span so collaboration is immediate and outcomes can be owned end‑to‑end. See Amazon’s description of the principle for context: Amazon Two‑Pizza Teams.
Size alone isn’t enough. Teams must be multidisciplinary: product, engineering, design and data. Spotify’s writings on squads and tribes remain a useful reference for organising around customer problems while retaining autonomy.
Three practical levers to scale outcomes, not output
1. Define clear team missions, not roadmaps
Replace feature roadmaps with mission statements that describe the outcome and the metric that matters. A good mission answers: who are we helping, what outcome will change for them, and how will we measure it? Missions unlock autonomy because they convert vague priorities into a bounded decision space.
2. Build a minimal operating model for autonomy
Autonomy without guardrails becomes chaos. Put in place four lightweight rules:
- Decision rights: who decides product scope, tech stack, and go‑to‑market timing?
- Interfaces: define how teams integrate (APIs, contracts, events).
- Shared standards: security, accessibility and performance thresholds.
- Outcome metrics: one North Star and two supporting KPIs per team.
These rules are not bureaucracy; they are friction‑free guardrails that let teams move fast while remaining composable. The aim is to remove permission‑seeking, not to remove oversight.
3. Protect learning loops and discovery time
Teams need time to test, iterate and fail fast. Institutionalise discovery as a funded activity: dedicate a predictable slice of capacity for experiments, and ensure learnings are captured centrally. Protecting discovery prevents organisations from reverting to a feature factory when delivery pressure ramps up.
Protecting breakout innovation from corporate gravity
One of the perennial challenges is taking a small team’s breakthrough idea and scaling it across a legacy organisation. Successful companies create protected spaces with three attributes:
- Autonomy with accountability: startups within the company should have distinct P&L or outcome ownership.
- Scaling pathways: a clear, staged route to integrate into core operations (APIs, platforms, playbooks).
- Executive sponsorship: senior leaders who accept short‑term inefficiency for long‑term optionality.
Spotify’s squad/tribe approach and ING’s tribe model demonstrate different ways to architect those spaces so that great ideas survive the trip from lab to line. The trick is to remove the choke points: procurement, legacy architecture and risk‑averse governance that treats novelty as a compliance problem rather than a learning opportunity.
Measure what matters — and stop confusing activity with impact
Organisations love velocity metrics because they’re easy to report. But velocity is not value. Move metrics upstream to customer outcomes and business impact. Useful measures include:
- Adoption rate: proportion of target users achieving the intended outcome.
- Retention delta: change in retention attributable to the team’s mission.
- Economic value: contribution to gross margin or cost to serve.
Linking team performance to these measures aligns incentives: teams will stop optimising for ticket throughput and start optimising for sustained user value.
Bringing it together: governance that enables rather than constrains
Good governance is lightweight and directional. Shift the conversation from control to enablement: provide the platforms, shared services and standards that remove mundane friction, and use governance forums to unblock rather than to micro‑manage. When leaders act more like architects of capability than micro‑controllers of activity, organisations gain the freedom to experiment at scale.
If you are a product leader or CEO, start by asking which teams in your organisation are structured around outcomes and which are still organised around functions. Rewire the ones that matter most — customer journeys, platform adoption, and core monetisation paths — into small, mission‑driven teams. Fund discovery, set clear interfaces, and insist on outcome metrics. The payoff is not just speed; it’s sustained strategic agility that turns innovation into a repeatable capability.
Ready for action? Pick one end‑to‑end customer journey, create a chartered team with a measurable mission, and protect 20% of their capacity for discovery for the next quarter. If that feels radical, remember: transforming structures is merely a practical way of aligning the organisation with the people it serves.
Leave a Reply