Why do so many organisations cheer for autonomous product teams, then wonder why progress stalls a year later? The idea is seductive: small, empowered teams owning outcomes, moving fast, and bypassing bureaucratic drag. But autonomy without structure becomes anarchy; ownership without aligned purpose becomes busywork. If you lead product, engineering or innovation, this article explains the practical patterns that separate transient “squad theatre” from sustained, outcome-driven product performance.
1. Autonomy is not the same as independence
Granting teams decision-making power is necessary, but insufficient. Too many companies interpret autonomy as an instruction to “do what you want.” That produces local optimisation and fragmentation: duplicated work, inconsistent UX, and competing metrics that confuse customers.
Fix: design clear guardrails. Define the outcomes each team is accountable for, the metrics that show success, and the non-functional constraints (security, accessibility, platform APIs). Teams need room to choose how they deliver, but within a shared architectural and product governance framework. Think of autonomy as a lane to drive in, not an empty road.
Practical steps
- Create a concise outcomes contract: a short doc that links team goals to user value and business impact.
- Standardise essential platform APIs and libraries so teams can move fast without rebuilding common capabilities.
- Publish the constraints publicly so decisions are visible and predictable.
2. Outcomes over outputs — for real this time
The temptation to measure output is powerful: features launched, tickets closed, sprints completed. Outputs are easy to count; outcomes are harder to prove. But measuring the wrong thing drives the wrong behaviour.
Adopt a disciplined outcomes model: each team should own a small set of customer and business metrics (engagement, retention, conversion, cost-to-serve). Use experiments to test hypotheses and stop vanity work quickly. This is more than rhetoric — it requires rewiring planning, funding and incentives.
Case in point: Duolingo organises around clear metrics for growth and engagement, running experiments that connect product changes directly to user behaviour. Their product structure ties teams to measurable impact rather than feature checklists.
Practical steps
- Replace long feature roadmaps with hypothesis-led experiments mapped to a target metric.
- Use north-star metrics plus a small set of leading indicators; keep teams focused on the signal, not the noise.
- Fund teams for outcomes: shift budgets from project-based to mission-based funding cycles.
3. Platform thinking and intentional dependency management
Autonomous teams still depend on shared systems: identity, payments, data, instrumentation. When those systems are poorly managed, velocity collapses and teams waste cycles waiting for support.
Successful organisations treat these shared capabilities as products in their own right. The platform team’s job is to increase the throughput of product teams — measured by how often teams can ship end-to-end without external blockers.
The Spotify model popularised this separation between feature teams and enabling platform capabilities. Many companies copy the terminology; the ones that succeed treat the platform as a product with SLAs, roadmaps and a product manager accountable for developer experience.
Practical steps
- Map dependencies across teams and prioritise platform work that reduces cross-team friction.
- Define clear SLAs for shared services and monitor them publicly.
- Invest in developer experience: good docs, SDKs, and internal onboarding reduce coordination costs.
4. Leadership: create alignment, not control
Leadership’s role is not to micro-manage teams; it’s to create context. That means setting an inspiring north star, aligning incentives, and removing organisational impediments. Too often leaders celebrate autonomy while preserving reporting structures that pull people into matrix overload.
Large transformations that succeeded — for example, ING’s agile move — combined empowerment with strong senior sponsorship and explicit redesign of ways of working. Leaders had to tolerate short-term mess for long-term gain and be disciplined about keeping teams aligned to customer outcomes.
Practical steps
- Align executive incentives to customer and product outcomes, not feature delivery.
- Run regular cross-team prioritisation forums that are lightweight and outcome-focused.
- Coach managers to become enablers: unblock, mentor, and connect teams with customers and stakeholders.
Where to start tomorrow
If you take one thing from this, make it this: autonomy without alignment is a path to entropy. Start by declaring one outcome that matters to the business and assign a truly cross-functional team to it for an experiment cycle. Protect that team from changes in scope, give them clear metrics, and ensure they have the platform support they need.
Autonomy works when teams are empowered with purpose, measure what matters, and operate on a solid platform. Do that, and you’ll turn the myth of autonomous squads into a predictable engine of customer value.
Call to action: If you want a short diagnostic to assess whether your product teams are set up to deliver outcomes, ping me and I’ll share a checklist I use with leadership teams.
Leave a Reply